← All clips · Uncategorized

Applying from a phone

PASSING GATE Guest 8 steps · 20.8s · recorded Aug 30, 11:30 AM · 77584d6

Viewing an archived run (20260830T182943Z-77584d6). Back to the current run.

This run has no video.

Speed

Source: e2e/scenarios/test_wf_applying_from_a_phone.py:1 · run 20260830T182943Z-77584d6 · steps carry start_ms/end_ms offsets into the video

Steps

  1. 390x844 is the design width, not an edge case — it is where the owner reviews.

  2. Five inline `grid-template-columns` used to outrank the media query here, so Instagram and Twitter shared 150px each and the run-of-show slots — the one grid written as auto-fit — were the only ones that behaved.

  3. Headcount min, max and bar minimum were 95px each — three columns forced inline — with a four-line capacity note in one of them. That is the 'not aligned' in the note, exactly.

  4. It was 179px — 21% of the screen — and covered 14 elements of the table above it. It keeps the submit button, the error line, and the one read-out that changes as you type; the other two moved up beside their own inputs.

  5. `position: fixed` was rejected: it trades an overlap you can scroll past for one you cannot. Sticky is right, and the form reserves the bar's height so nothing ends up behind it.

  6. The strip steps aside while the page moves and comes back when it stops, so the name of the field you are scrolling past is never the thing underneath it.

  7. The bar goes 62px to 110px because plan 244 makes it name every missing field. That is the state the owner was in when he wrote the note both plans answer, so it is the state worth measuring: taller bar, and still no label behind it.

  8. Two- and three-column rows, the tier table, a strip-height bar. This was a phone-width regression, not a redesign — desktop must be untouched, and it got shorter rather than different.

Notes

Sign in to leave a timestamped review note. Notes land in the same review backlog as in-page annotations.

  1. No notes on this clip yet.
Run history (6)